A friend of ours was fond of using the expression, "light dawns on marble head" as he slowly perceived what he believed to be obvious and right there before him had he only been more attentive. So it may be with all of us, from time to time. Sometimes things are not at all obvious, though, and we're simply being modest, as was the case with our friend. Sometimes it's simply a matter of jotting things down that can be viewed in plain sight.
Plotted below is the yield on the 30-year UST at roughly its high and low marks for the year, for each of the past four years (2010-2013). The cyclical high yield in each year has come in the rather narrow period of late March – early April. In fact, the high yield has printed in a period spanning no more than 26 days! US Treasury bonds, particularly at the long end of the yield curve show their greatest price reaction to economic strength or weakness, signs that their greatest foe, inflation, might be creeping in or receding. Hence, when the economy appears to be at its strongest, the 30-year trades its weakest and prints its high yield for the cycle.
The cyclical low in yield for the 30-year has occurred in a somewhat wider range over the past three years, from late July – early Sept (too early to tell for 2013). While this is a wider period than its high yield mark, this data still indicates a span of less than 45 days. Now, perhaps this is purely coincidental that the 30-year would signal its greatest price strength and weakness at precisely the same time each of the past four years. Or perhaps, there's some pattern worth discerning.
Why this pattern might occur requires some speculation, but as another friend of ours was fond of saying, "numbers don't lie". We believe the reason for this trend is the economic false-starts we’ve seen for Q1 for the each of the past three years and, we suspect, carrying over into Q1 2013. As discussed in a previous post on this blog, the data from BLS and Commerce have been favorable in each winter period for the past four years, causing bond prices to weaken, only to fall off in spring and summer (causing bond prices to rally).
We believe that this pattern is not coincidental, but rather relates to the seasonal adjustment models that the two departments use to account for what they believe to be normal seasonal patterns. If true, these factors are distorting the picture of growth in the winter months, causing the UST long bond to weaken substantially (in price) only to recover strongly as that growth fails to carry forward into the warmer months.